|This e-mail was sent to a large number of
people, including schools as part of an action plan to rally support for
the Mimiwhangata full reserve proposal. Vince Kerr is consultant for the
Department of Conservation in what it calls their 'northern chapter', together
with Dr Roger Grace. Both have spent a long time studying the area and
various reports to DoC have been produced by them. Vince Kerr also runs
the Nga Maunga ki te Moana (from the mountains to the sea) Conservation
Trust. The reason we bring this e-mail to your attention is that it is
full of misleading information, regurgitated by scientists who should know
better. It serves to brain-wash innocent school children who are then are
asked to give their support in order to boost the count of the number of
proponents. How much sadder can it get?
It is also rather disturbing that so many nonsensical, false and misleading statements come from people who call themselves scientists, people who lead the pro-marine reserves lobby, people who hush up what is really happening in the sea at any cost to serve their own beliefs. Read on.
-- Seafriends home -- the
war over marine reserves -- Rev 20050621,
Mimiwhangata needs you!
peninsula, located on the east coast of Northland, north of Whangarei,
is one of the most beautiful stretches of the Northland coastline. It is
valued for spectacular scenery, wildlife and cultural heritage. Beyond
the shoreline, Mimiwhangata Marine Park extends 1000 metres offshore. The
sea once teemed with life, including tuatua, kina, scallops, crayfish,
mussels and numerous species of fish ………... ” (Mimiwhangata Marine Reserve
Photo: Mimiwhangata Peninsula and Rimariki Island
three years of investigation and discussions with the local hapu, a proposal
for a Marine Reserve at Mimiwhangata has hit the streets.
[Map shows the proposed boundary options for the Mimiwhangata Marine Reserve]
While the country is preoccupied with the theory of who owns the coast our marine environments continue to decline ……….. At Mimiwhangata something very different and positive is going on.
In my view we do not have the right to postpone taking simple steps to address this serious decline of marine life. Marine reserves are no longer an experiment in NZ or internationally. They deliver biodiversity protection and promise much more in terms of emergent network properties. In simple terms an effective network of marine reserves will support all parts of the marine ecosystem and the valuable functions it performs. It can easily be argued that our marine environment is our most valuable natural system and resource. It is suffering under massive strain from exploitation and pollution. It is a simple and sensible idea to set aside a few areas as ‘natural’. It is irresponsible not to so in today's world.
The author is correct noting that marine life is in decline and he even mentions pollution. What he does not know is that pollution has become the main degrading influence on the sea, leaving the effect of exploitation (fishing) far behind. In fact, pollution causes a decline in fish stocks, which looks as if it was caused by overfishing. Are marine reserves going to help? Of course not, as is proven beyond any doubt by all the coastal marine reserves in NZ. To claim that marine reserves are no longer an experiment and that they deliver biodiversity protection, is not borne out by the facts. We now have overwhelming anecdotal and scientific information that the biodiversity in all our coastal marine reserves is declining. Will networks of these help? Of course not. A chain is but as strong as its weakest link and a chain of degrading marine reserves will be a degrading chain of reserves. Does it make sense to set aside natural areas? If pollution were no threat, it would. But how natural would a protected area be in the whole where natural means fished?In Northland with DoC support, a research team consisting of scientists and students from the Leigh Lab, Dr Roger Grace and myself have undertaken biological surveys and habitat mapping at Mimiwhangata on the Whangarei coast over the past three years.
Very misleading indeed. The fact is that DoC is pushing for more marine reserves, and has contracted (and paid for with your and my money) scientists to investigate for the sole purpose of converting this MPA protected area into a fully protected marine reserve.
We have found things to be concerned about:
DoC has been dishonest with the local Tangata Whenua who expect only a temporary closure (tapu) and have been made to believe that a marine reserve can be reviewed at a later date to recommence fishing. Fact is that this is not so. Northern Maori have now realised that their main source of seafood comes from recreational fishing and not from customary rights which are very restricted. They have never been offered full custodianship by way of Mataitai or Taiapure. Consequently, Maori support can now no longer be counted on.The Mimiwhangata marine reserve proposal is special: it is of a significant size, it will include a spectacular array of connected habitats, it will provide opportunities for the hapu to lead in conservation on our coast, it will support our next efforts to establish a process leading to the creation of a network of marine reserves in Northland. It is your chance to make a difference for the ocean. Imagine visiting Mimiwhangata one day and seeing a bit of the Northland coast where the marine life is completely undisturbed!
Yes, it is large and has many connected habitats. But false again. Much ado is being made of networks of protected areas by scientists worldwide. But fact remains that none of this has ever been proved as it is all based on belief, assisted by computer models of fictional environments. Not even one pilot study has been conducted anywhere in the world. So, armed with no knowledge at all, scientists are pressing for these fictional networks that steal fishermen's rights without any tangible benefit in return. How stupid is this? To claim that marine life will return to a completely undisturbed state is indefensible as this has not happened in any of our coastal marine reserves and cannot happen until the threat from degradation is taken away.
You can write, phone or email Northland Conservancy Department of Conservation for a copy of the Proposal. Contact details below:
Mimiwhangata Proposal phone line: 09 459-7942
Mimiwhangata Proposal email address: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mimiwhangata (Doc) Postal address: Mimiwhangata Proposal
Department of Conservation, Northland Conservancy Office, PO Box 842, Whangarei.
There is a Mimiwhangata CD I have produced that has technical reports,
the proposal, maps, images and a video. It can be obtained by request –
Much better is to get a Seafriends CD ($30) with the entire content of the Seafriends web site: 2500 pages of learning with over 5000 images and screen-sized slide shows of 1500 underwater photographs. The world's best information about the sea and its predicament and entirely reliable as it is independent and not influenced by government agendas or beliefs.
The e-version of the proposal, maps and questionnaire is available on the DoC website: www.doc.govt.nz/regionalinfo/001~Northland/004~Conservation/index.asp
Your support for this project is needed now
As you are probably aware marine reserves are created in this country through a somewhat complex and lengthy process. You may also be aware that there is substantial support for marine reserves in New Zealand and for an effective network of marine reserves. While this is wonderful it must be demonstrated by submissions of support for each proposal. A strong showing of support for this proposal will give DoC and the government the confidence to continue with marine reserve work. It will also provide justification for the formal application for the marine reserve at Mimiwhangata to be lodged with out delay. So it is important for the silent majority who support marine conservation and marine reserves to be submitters.
False. DoC has never listened to objections and has spent millions on blatantly false propaganda to brainwash New Zealanders for supporting marine reserves. As long as people are kept in the dark about what has really happened to our existing marine reserves and that none of them work, of course they will remain supportive. Had the author been scientifically neutral, he would have asked the reader to either support or object to the proposal. He would also have mentioned the real state of marine protection. Could he be biased?
You can submit your comments for this marine reserve proposal on the questionnaire available from the DoC website. You can also send an email submission or post a letter with comments, your name and address. The submissions can be as simple as “I support the marine reserve proposal” or they can be complex and you can develop your reasons for support as much as you like. At the end of this email I have copied The Marine Reserve Manifesto for NZ by Dr Bill Ballantine. This is a good place to start thinking about marine reserves.
Be a Supporter
If you support this proposal I am asking you to complete a submission and send it to DoC, Northland. You can use the questionnaire available on the DoC website or send an email including your name and address by simply clicking on the email link above. If you do this you will have made a significant contribution to this project.
Reader, witness how a simple click without any personal input is used to count support. We know that thousands of personal votes, complete with personal notes have been rejected or counted as a single vote when they were objections. How fair is that?
Be a Serious Supporter
Discuss this proposal with five, (or more) people and seek their support in the form of a submission. Achieving an effective network of marine reserves in New Zealand is something we can all contribute to and support now, in the same we are committed to our national Parks on land.
Time and again marine reserves are compared with our National Parks, which is extremely misleading. Our National Parks are the left-over no-good lands, mainly consisting of rock and ice; places to poor, too dry, too wet, too steep to do anything with. And inside these all kinds of pest roam freely, from rats, stoats, feral cats, deer, goats, possums, wasps to wilding pines and other noxious plants. In the long term, these Parks do not protect our native wildlife. By contrast, the sea is productive everywhere and easily accessible. Very few introduced species are found here. It is pristine by comparison, even under the pressure from fishing.
Be an Angelic Supporter
Activate your own networks, family, workmates etc. to support of this marine reserve proposal. Write a letter to the editor of the Northern Advocate or Herald. Write to the Ministers of Conservation, Fisheries and Environment.
Submissions for the Proposal close on October 12 . If the response is favourable the project will then move into the formal Application stage. False. It will go ahead anyway, regardless of overwhelming averse public reaction.
Thank you for your support
Nga Maunga ki te Moana Conservation Trust
Disclaimer: The message above does not necessarily represent the views, position or policy of the Department of Conservation or any other organisation other than Nga Maunga ki te Moana Conservation Trust and myself as author.
By Dr Bill Ballantine
In New Zealand, we have discussed marine reserves for 40 years. We established the first reserve 30 years ago. We now have 18 reserves. We know that they are practical, and that once established they are popular and successful. We have carried out enough trials and tests. We should now move to a policy based on principles. We need to organise the scientists, interest the general public, inform the politicians and instruct the planners.
Quite misleading. The author says they are practical; not that they work or protect the environment. He says they are popular and successful as measured by the number of visitors, rather than by the state of the environment. He says that enough trials and tests have been carried out, but not what their results are. Why is it that DoC is still trying hard to prove that marine reserves are working, each time being thrown back by contrary evidence? Why do we want to rush ahead with so little supportive and so much contrary evidence?
So each region requires a policy with the following principles:
Is the matter urgent? Why? Why do the wrong thing today when we can do it right tomorrow? We see the seas deteriorating at an alarming rate, mainly due to degradation but marine reserves cannot help, as is overwhelmingly borne out by all marine reserves we now have. So why hurry?
Bill Ballantine, Leigh Marine Laboratory